Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chelsea's avatar

Having applied for jobs in the democracy space last year after being laid off, I noticed just how undemocratic the democracy space is. First of all, not many remote jobs, ruling out a lot of disabled people, as well as anyone who can't afford to live in New York or DC. Second, so many of the "about us" pages were teeming with bios of elite university grads. Third, what few "new career" roles existed were either implicitly or explicitly age-limited, so if someone had a late start or a career shift, they weren't given the opportunity.

This isn't about sour grapes at not having been hired in this industry. I'm thinking much bigger than myself. Democracy is supposed to be about all the people, right? How can we make that case and gain the best insights if we're loading teams up with people from the same fancy institutions, wearing the same nice suits, living in the same expensive cities, and following essentially the same career trajectory? It seems so patently absurd that it shouldn't have to be mentioned, but only a few groups seem to understand that the democracy sector should be more representative of the democracy we're trying to strengthen.

I'm grateful to Rashawn for putting this out there. Diversity of all kinds absolutely makes every organization, and our democracy, stronger, and I hope more groups will do more than pay lip service to that idea.

Expand full comment
Nina Taylor's avatar

1000000% agree... More can be done to foster innovation in the democracy space. Spread out the funding and allow the space for more than 1 or 2 ideas to thrive.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts